Information Management and Information System Analysis to Support the Achievement of University Performance Agreements with the Government

  • Titis Sari Putri Universitas Brawijaya
  • Herman Tolle
  • Ismiarta Aknuranda
Keywords: Soft Systems Methodology, SSM, Root Cause Analysis, RCA, University Performance Agreement

Abstract

State Universities in Indonesia have college performance agreement with Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC) that consists of performance indicators and target achievements in a year. For assuring the integration, availability, and data validity of performance indicators, good information management with utilized information system is needed by entire working unit. Information management process to support data collection and target achievements on college performance agreement with MoEC in Brawijaya University still has many deficiencies. The process involves many stakeholders because it covers all areas of business in Brawijaya University (UB). Quality Asurance Center in UB as the unit that collects and processes the data of target achievements complained about data collection that takes a long time and it is often incomplete. The faculties, study programs, and other units experience the unavailability of most data and target performance indicators on information system that is used as reference for implementing business processes. The problem responded lightly by Information and Communication Technology Unit in Brawijaya University with consideration that Information System used is in accordance with the needs of the academic community. On the other hand, the responses about the problem from the lecturers, staff, and students are different. This research tries to explore and evaluate the problem and formulate the steps of transformations to refine the situation by using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) with some additional Root Cause Analysis (RCA) stages. The major contribution of the research is giving the insights about the problem thoroughly comprising various perspective of stakeholders, transforming the refinement of the situation presented in conceptual model, and the stakeholders’ assessment of the conceptual model. This research also visualizes the implementation of RCA to dig up more perspective of the stakeholders and helps identifying the activities to construct conceptual model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersen, B., & Fagerhaug, T. N. 2014. The ASQ Pocket Guide to Root Cause Analysis. Milwauke, USA: ASQ Quality Press.
Checkland, P.B. 1989. “Soft Systems Methodology”. Human Systems Management (8), pp. 273-289.
Checkland, P. 2000. “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: Includes a 30-Year Retrospective”. The Journal of the Operational Research Society (51:5), pp. 11-58 (doi.org/10.2307/254200).
Connell, N. A. D. 2001. “Evaluating soft OR: Some reflections on an apparently ‘unsuccessful’ implementation using a soft systems methodology (SSM) based approach”. Journal of the Operational Research Society, (52:2), pp.150–160 (doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601054).
Hanafizadeh, P., & Aliehyaei, R. 2011. “The Application of Fuzzy Cognitive Map in Soft System Methodology”. Systemic Practice and Action Research (24:4), pp.325–354 (doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9190-z).
Hardman, J., & Caceres, A. P. 2011. “A Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) Based Framework for Evaluating Managed Learning Environments”. Systemic Practice and Action Research (24:2), pp. 165–185 (doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9182-4).
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi (Kemenristekdikti). 2016. “Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 51 Tahun 2016”. Kemenristekdikti, pp. 1–58 (http://itjen.ristekdikti.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SALINAN-PERMENRISTEKDIKTI-NOMOR-51-TAHUN-2016-TENTANG-SAKIP.pdf).
Kreher H. 1994. “Some recurring themes in using SSM”. Journal of the Operational Research Society (45), pp. 1293–1303 (doi.org/10.1057/jors.1994.202).
Ledington P and Donaldson J. 1997. “Soft OR and management practice: a study of the adoption and use of Soft Systems Methodology”. Journal of the Operational Research Society (48), pp. 229–240 (doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600350).
Mehregan, M. R., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Kazemi, A. 2012. “An application of Soft System Methodology”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (41), pp. 426–433 (doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.051)
Mingers, J., & Sarah, T. 1992. “The use of soft systems methodology in practice”. Journal of the Operational Research Society (43:4), pp. 321–332 (doi.org/10.1057/jors.1992.47).
Okes, Duke. 2019. Root cause analysis: the core of problem solving and corrective action, Second Edition. Milwauke, USA: ASQ Quality Press.
Peppard, Joe dan Ward, John. 2016. The Strategic Management of Information Systems: Building A Digital Strategy 4th Edition. England: John Wiley & Sons.
Por, J. 2008. “The use of soft system methodology (SSM) in a serviced-focussed study on the personal tutor’s role”. Nurse Education in Practice (8:5), pp. 335–342 (doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.12.002).
Rodriguez, J. 2016. “Step 6: part I—root cause analysis. CAPA in the Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industries” (doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-907568-58-9.00009-6).
Ulloa, Ricardo Rodriguez., dan Careces, Alberto Paucar. 2005. “Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): Combining Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and System Dynamics (SD)”. Systemic Practice and Action Research (18), pp. 303-334 (doi.org/10.1007/s11213-005-4816-7).
Published
2021-04-30
How to Cite
Putri, T. S., Tolle, H., & Aknuranda, I. (2021). Information Management and Information System Analysis to Support the Achievement of University Performance Agreements with the Government. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 17(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v17i1.989