Generative AI in Software Engineering Education: A Study on Competency and Perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v22i2.1530Keywords:
Generative AI, software engineering education, skills gap, SWEBOK, case study, human-AI collaboration, prompt engineeringAbstract
Software Engineering (SE) education struggles to align graduate competencies with industry needs, a challenge compounded by Generative AI (GenAI). This study’s purpose is to explore how structured GenAI utilization can enhance student competencies and learning perceptions. This exploratory case study used a mixed-method design involving four students in a controlled experiment. Data was collected via quantitative (SWEBOK-based artifact assessments, questionnaires) and qualitative narrative reflections. Results show the group using AI produced higher-quality artifacts and reported a more efficient, positive experience. A key finding is the transformation of work processes, shifting the primary challenge from manual execution to the critical evaluation of AI outputs. Due to its small scale, the findings are preliminary but suggest GenAI can enhance competencies. This requires an educational shift toward human-AI collaboration skills like critical evaluation and prompt engineering. Further validation with larger, more comprehensive studies is essential to generalize these initial insights.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Sistem Informasi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).




