Acceptance Analysis of the Electronic Kohort Information System for Maternal and Child Health Using the Technology Acceptance Model at the Bima City Health Center

  • Hizriansyah Politeknik Medica Farma Husada Mataram
  • Shinta Prawitasari
  • Lutfan Lazuardi
Keywords: Acceptance, Health Information System, Electronic Kohort. Maternal and Child Health, Technology Acceptance Model

Abstract

The Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Program in Indonesia is faced with a diversity of achievements between regions caused by disparities in the capacity of the health system and exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic which has caused a decrease in service activities and reporting quality so that digitalization of services is needed.  This type of research is qualitative research with the design of phenomenological studies using thematic analysis with the help of the Nvivo 12 application. Primary data collection was carried out by means of observation and in-depth interviews with research informants by purposive sampling. To increase the credibility of the data use source triangulation. The research informants consisted of the head of the family health services section, the head of the health centers and the midwife as the user of the e-cohort.  Thirteen informants (11 women and 2 men) participated in the study. Most informants can use the core functions of the e-cohort app navigation menu. The study proposes that the perceived perception of ease of use may not be in line with the perceived expediency of explaining variations in the successful acceptance of MCH e-cohort applications. The study also found that there were differences in outcomes between user perceptions at the operational level and policy makers at the managerial level. In general, the analysis collects several types of obstacles and potentially problems that negatively affect the usefulness of the e-cohort application : not being able to make the work of midwives easier and faster, ineffective and not so much to increase the productivity of performance. With regard to ease of use, users feel that the e-cohort can be easily learned and used.  The e-cohort is considered to have value as a system that makes the work of midwives more difficult and hinders the work, however, the appearance, elements, features and design are perceived to be quite easy to use. In addition, users also highlight the need to consider how the system can be implemented in order to minimize the impact and optimize usability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, D. A., Nelson, R., Todd, P. A., & Nelson, R. R. (1992). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication Increasing Systems Usage Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. Source: MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.
Aji, A. H. (2017). Expert System for Diagnosing Diseases of Pregnant Women Using the Certainty Factor (CF) Method. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/1556
Ammenwerth, E. (2019). Technology Acceptance Models in ealth nformatics: TAM and UTAUT. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 263, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190111
Barzekar, H., Ebrahimzadeh, F., Luo, J., Karami, M., Robati, Z., & Goodarzi, P. (2019). Adoption of hospital information system among nurses: A technology acceptance model approach. Acta Informatica Medica, 27(5), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2019.27.305-310
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results [B.S., Industrial Engineering, Wayne State University]. In Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3652.1648
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Davlyatov, G., Borkowski, N., Feldman, S., Qu, H., Burke, D., Bronstein, J., & Brickman, A. (2019). Health Information Technology Adoption and Clinical Performance in Federally Qualified Health Centers. 00(00), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000231
Desvronita. (2021). Factors Influencing Interest in Using E-Wallet Payment Systems Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Akmenika: Journal of Accounting And Management, 18(2). https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/akmenika/article/view/2142/1298%0Ahttps://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/akmenika/article/view/2142
Garavand, A., Samadbeik, M., Kafashi, M., & Abhari, S. (2017). Acceptance of Health Information Technologies, Acceptance of Mobile Health: A Review Article. J Biomed Phys Eng, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02120_1.x
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares: Concepts, techniques, and applications using smart PLS 3.0 ( 2nd ed.) programs. Diponegoro University Semarang.
Hadiyat, Y. D. (2014). The Digital Divide in Indonesia (Case Study in Wakatobi Regency). Pekommas, 17(2), 81–90.
Handayani, P. W., Hidayanto, A. N., Pinem, A. A., Hapsari, I. C., Sandhyaduhita, P. I., & Budi, I. (2017). Acceptance model of a Hospital Information System. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 99, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.004
Hardiana, D., Nugraha, N., Dewi, F. P., Supriyatna, Y., & Lhutfi, I. (2022). The Effectiveness of Using Online Learning Media during the Covid-19 Pandemic Study in Students of the Accounting Education Study Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI). JPAK (Journal of Accounting and Financial Education), 10(1).
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
Igbaria, M. (1994). An examination of the factors contributing to microcomputer technology acceptance. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(4), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8022(94)90023-X
Jing, P., Xu, G., Chen, Y., Shi, Y., & Zhan, F. (2020). The determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles: A systematic review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051719
Jo, H. S., Song, T. M., & Kim, B. G. (2017). Analysis of the factors affecting consumer acceptance of accredited online health information. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(11), 1757–1763. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1757
Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3, 48–59.
Kabbiri, R., Dora, M., Kumar, V., Elepu, G., & Gellynck, X. (2018). Mobile phone adoption in agri-food sector: Are farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa connected? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131(December), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.010
Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021a). Blueprint: Health Digital Transformation Strategy 2024. In Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia (Ed. 1). https://dto.kemkes.go.id/Digital-Transformation-Strategy-2024.pdf
Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021b). Socialization of e-Cohort Application Integration, MPDN and Komdat Kesmas. Directorate of Family Health.
Kinanti, F. S., & Pertiwi, A. A. P. (2019). Evaluation of the Use of Nursing Management Information System at Grhasia Mental Hospital, Yogyakarta Special Region. Journal of Information Systems for Public Health, 4(1), 16–27.
Kowitlawakul, Y. (2011). The technology acceptance model: Predicting nurses’ intention to use telemedicine technology (eICU). CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing, 29(7), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9dd4a
Küllmar, M., & Zarbock, A. (2018). Acute Kidney Injury and Information Technology. Contributions to Nephrology, 193, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484965
Kurahashi, A. M., Stinson, J. N., van Wyk, M., Luca, S., Jamieson, T., Weinstein, P., Cafazzo, J. A., Lokuge, B., Cohen, E., Rapoport, A., & Husain, A. (2018). The perceived ease of use and usefulness of loop: evaluation and content analysis of a web-based clinical collaboration system. JMIR Human Factors, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.7882
Laksmi, N. M. D. P. (2021). Socialization Meeting on Recording and Reporting of Maternal and Child Health E-Cohorts. Directorate of Family Health of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia.
Lazuardi, L., Sanjaya, G. Y., Ali, P. B., Siahaan, R. G. M., Achmad, L., & Wulandari, H. (2021). Interoperability of Health Digitalization: Case Study on Use of Information Technology for Maternal and Child Health Services in Indonesia. Business Information Systems, July, 317–327.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Mardiana, S., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., & Aprianingsih, A. (2015). Validating the Conceptual Model for Predicting Intention to Use as Part of Information System Success Model: The Case of an Indonesian Government Agency. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.150

Mikarsih, A., Wardah, S., & Hidayat, S. (2020). Factors Affecting the Implementation of a Computer-Based Accounting Information System at the East Mataram Primary Tax Service Office. Scientific Journal of Accounting And Finance, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32639/jiak.v9i1.372
Nadal, C., Sas, C., & Doherty, G. (2020). Technology acceptance in mobile health: Scoping review of definitions, models, and measurement. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2196/17256
Nugroho, H. ., Supriyanto, S., & Notobroto, H. . (2016). The role of perceived organizational support, personal characteristics and perceived enjoyment in the maternal and child health information system acceptance model (The role of perceived organizational support, personal characteristics, and perceived enjoyment da. Universitas Airlangga.
Nugroho, H. S. W., Notobroto, H. B., & Rosyanti, L. (2021). Acceptance model of a mandatory health information system in Indonesia. Healthcare Informatics Research, 27(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.4258/HIR.2021.27.2.127
Payne, T. H., Lovis, C., Gutteridge, C., Pagliari, C., Natarajan, S., Yong, C., & Zhao, L.-P. (2019). Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries. Journal of Global Health.
Rachmawati, A. I., Puspitasari, R. D., & Cania, E. (2017). Factors Affecting Antenatal Care (ANC) Visits of Pregnant Women. Majority, 7(November), 72–76.
Rush, B., Celi, L. A., & Stone, D. J. (2019). Applying machine learning to continuously monitored physiological data. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 33(5), 887–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0219-z
Sadoughi, F., & Erfannia, L. (2017). Health information system in a cloud computing context. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 236(6), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-759-7-290
Shachak, A., Domb, S., Borycki, E., Fong, N., Skyrme, A., Kushniruk, A., Reis, S., & Ziv, A. (2015). A Pilot Study of Computer-Based Simulation Training for Enhancing Family Medicine Residents’ Competence in Computerized Settings. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 216(Figure 1), 506–510. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-506
Sharifian, R., Askarian, F., Nematolahi, M., & Farhadi, P. (2014). Factors influencing nurses’ acceptance of hospital information systems in Iran: application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Health Information Management Journal, 43(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.12826/18333575.2014.0001.Sharifian
Sigilipu, S. (2013). The Effect of The Application of Management Accounting Information and Performance Measurement Systems on Managerial Performance. EMBA Journal : Journal of Economic Research, Management, Business And Accounting, 1(3), 239–247.
Sijariemas Technology Innovation. (2021). Submission of MCH E-Cohort Application to the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Sijarimas.Co.Id. https://www.sijariemas.co.id/penyerahan-aplikasi-e-kohort-kia-kepada-kementrian-kesehatan/
Smeru. (2020). COVID-19 Impacts on Nutrition and Maternal Child Health Services: Case Studyin Five Regions in Indonesia (p. 5). Smeru.
Susanto, R., & Haryati, T. (2019). Product Distribution Data Warehouse Modeling in PT. X. INTENSIVE: Scientific Journal of Research and Application of Information Systems Technology, 3(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v3i2.12769
Szajna, B. (1994). Software evaluation and choice: Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 18(3), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/249621
Usmanova, G., Gresh, A., Cohen, M. A., Kim, Y. M., Srivastava, A., Joshi, C. S., Bhatt, D. C., Haws, R., Wadhwa, R., Sridhar, P., Bahl, N., Gaikwad, P., & Anderson, J. (2020). Acceptability and barriers to use of the asman provider-facing electronic platform for peripartum care in public facilities in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, India: A qualitative study using the technology acceptance model-3. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228333
Utarini, A. (2020). Don't Know Then Don't Love: Kaulitative Research In Health Services (Galih (ed.)). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Utomo, A. P., Mariana, N., Sri, R., Rejeki, A., Lomba, J. T., No, J., & Mugas, S. (2018). Model Evaluasi Integrasi Kesuksesan dan Penerimaan Sistem Informasi E-learning Universitas. Ikraith Informatika, 2(1), 94–101. https://www.neliti.com/publications/226365/
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wicahyono, G., Setyanto, A., & Raharjo, S. (2019). Aplikasi Mobile Smart Birth Untuk Monitoring Ibu Hamil. It Cida, 5(1), 53–60. http://journal.amikomsolo.ac.id/index.php/itcida/article/view/90
Yani, A. (2018). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Dalam Bidang Kesehatan Masyarakat. PROMOTIF: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 8(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.31934/promotif.v8i1.235
Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., & Probst, J. C. (2006). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information and Management, 43(3), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006
Yulianti, Winarno, W. W., & Santoso, P. I. (2015). Evaluation of User Acceptance of the Implementation of the 2015 SatKer Application System at Government Agencies Managing the State Budget in Kulonprogo Regency Using Trust Integration and Symbolic Adoption Acceptance Model. National Seminar on Computer Science (SNIK 2015), 207–214.
Joseph, N., Grace, D. E., & Adiani, F. (2018). Development of a Web-Based Pregnancy Risk Detection Tool as a Reporting Recording System for Midwives. Journal of Health Research, 6(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.31983/jrk.v6i2.2932
Zainal, Y., Sanjaya, G. Y., & Hasanbasri, M. (2013). The Need for Information Systems in Managing Routine Data for Maternal and Child Health Monitoring. National Seminar on Indonesian Information Systems (SESINDO), 2–4.
Published
2023-04-05
How to Cite
Hizriansyah, Prawitasari, S., & Lazuardi, L. (2023). Acceptance Analysis of the Electronic Kohort Information System for Maternal and Child Health Using the Technology Acceptance Model at the Bima City Health Center. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 19(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v19i1.1207